Much ado has been made recently about the “arms race” that Collegiate Athletic Departments have been engaging in for the past few years. It should be noted that this phenomenon is not limited to Football in any way shape or form, (see the University of Cincinnati’s Varsity Village for reference) but as this is a Football site I will limit my discussion of this to Football. There are two different ways that schools engage in the so called arms race, one is building new training facilities, offices, meeting rooms ect, the other is stadium expansion/building/renovation. I do not have a problem with the first type. Generally speaking building of new weight training, medical, and academic centers has a value for everyone involved. Most of the time, every athlete has equal access to those facilities. In some cases Football may have their own weight training facilities but it is not out and out better then what the rest of the athletic population has, just separate. Furthermore many of these new facilities are financed exclusively in the form of donations to the athletic department and pass very little cost on to the athletic department itself which means that ticket prices aren’t raised and the general fee to the student stays about the same. Also having first class facilities is a requirement to compete at the highest level of the sport, though there are exceptions, see the Miami Hurricanes of the earlier this decade for reference. What I do have an issue with is the expansion/building/renovation of stadiums. More often than not the expenses inherent with expansion and renovation of stadiums fall directly on the shoulders of the fans and alumni who attend games in the form of higher ticket prices and alumni due’s. There are some exceptions, naming rights for stadiums can fetch a handsome sum, but the percentage of institutions that have taken that route to cover some of the cost are in the minority. Just for an example look at what the woeful Stanford Indians…er…I mean Cardinal have done.
Stanford Stadium in 2005

Stanford Stadium in 2006

What follows is a list of institutions that have either announced plans for stadium expansion/building/renovation and those who have expanded/built/renovated their stadium since 2005
Planned
Maryland Terrapins http://rethinkcollegepark.net/blog/2007/370/
Texas Longhorns http://www.statesman.com/sports/content/sports/photos/021006_stadium/index.html
Louisville Cardinals http://louisville.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=599126
Michigan Wolverines http://www.umich.edu/stadium/project-description/pr061117.html
Auburn Tigers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan-Hare_Stadium
Tennessee Volunteers http://utsports.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/020106aat.html
Wake Forest Demon Deacons http://wakeforestfacilities.com/
North Carolina Tar Heels http://www.fpc.unc.edu/DevelopmentPlan/DevPlanPDF/full_mod3.pdf (page 13)
Oklahoma Sooners http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaylord_Family_Oklahoma_Memorial_Stadium#Future_plans
Washington Huskies http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/12/01/100spo_d2uwfacilities001.cfm
Washington State http://martinstadium.org/
Cal Bears http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/05/09_architect.shtml
Minnesota Gophers http://www1.umn.edu/stadium/stadium.php
Illinois Fighting Illini http://www.athletics.uiuc.edu/renaissance/default.htm
Under Construction or Completed
LSU Tigers http://www.lsutaf.org/westside/index_flash.htm
NC State Wolfpack http://www.ncsu.edu/facilities/photographs/collection/2006/12/carter-finley-stadium.html
Virginia Tech Hokies http://www.hokiesports.com/football/lanestadium.html
Alabama Crimson Tide http://www.rolltide.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=8000&ATCLID=240645
Kansas State Wildcats http://www.kstatesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=400&SPID=212&SPSID=3058
Oklahoma State Cowboys http://www.pp.okstate.edu/projects/detail.php?loc=021-022&ident=02.2005
Baylor Bears http://baylorbears.cstv.com/school-bio/bay-casey-stadium.html
Clemson Tigers http://www.westzoneclub.com/
Texas Tech Red Raiders http://texastech.scout.com/2/548111.html
Nebraska Cornhuskers https://www.huskersnside.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=28081
Oregon State Beavers http://www.osubeavers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=4700&ATCLID=129676
Stanford Cardinal http://www.stanfordstadium.com/
Wisconsin Badgers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Randall_Stadium
Iowa Hawkeyes http://hawkeyesports.cstv.com/facilities/iowa-kinnick-stadium.html
Michigan State Spartans http://msuspartans.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/051805aah.html
This is by no means an exhaustive list as it does not address expansions taking place at schools that do not fall under the BCS blanket such as the newest stadium in the NCAA being built of UCF as we speak. When a professional team builds a new stadium they are at least up front about it. They want more money, that is all there is too it. They say flat out that they want the extra revenue inherent with building club seats and luxury boxes, the additional money from selling the naming rights for a decade or two to the highest bidder. They are at least honest, even if the way in which they fund their new stadiums is dubious at best. We do not see that kind of frank honesty with College Presidents and Athletic Directors, we should but we don’t. Part of that stems from the notion that many within the club hold that the college experience is not about the money. Presidents like to take that idea and thrust it upon their athletic departments, it is a deliberate affront to the truth. Which is that Universities are all about they money. Don’t listen to what they say, it is about the money and that is all it has ever been about, especially within the athletic department. The expansions, and renovations being under taken by these institutions do not benefit but the majority, but they do benefit a very small portion of their fans. These club seats and luxury boxes are well placed efforts to get prominent members of the alumni population to open that checkbook a cut them another check of an increasing growing amount of money. Stadium building projects are nothing new, this is a fact that is not lost on me. But there is an inherent difference between the projects of old and the one’s taking place across the country today. In the past universities would expand their stadiums to allow more people to attend games as the popularity of their given team grew. They wanted to get more people in the gates. While doing that increased revenues it also led to more and more expansions. The law of Supply and Demand is pretty evident here. However, at this point stadiums are not getting any bigger, in fact some of losing capacity. Athletic Departments across the country are taking away normal seats and replacing them with club and luxury one’s. Its simple economics, if you can get 100 dollars for seat A and 1,000 dollars for seat B you will try to have a lot of seat B’s. Those luxury and club seats generate a lot of revenue for these institutions. They do not want to attract more people to their gleaming Saturday Shrines, they just want to attract more reach people. On principal I don’t have an issue with that, after all the American Way is all about getting more; more people, more money, more whatever. The issue I have is that the reason the WASP’s flock to stadiums around the country is to watch 20 year old kids play a game. The rules dealing with the issue at hand are archaic at best, absolute displays of incompetency and disillusionment at worst. There is nothing wrong with a star player being tossed 500 after a great day on the field. The NCAA would like us all to engage in their way of thinking, that it is wrong to engage in that type of behaviour. Ask yourself this; what is actually wrong about that? If you are capable of rational and logical thought you probably said not a damn thing, and that is the correct answer. I know that my stance on this naturally leads into the whole pay for play argument that has been raging for decades. I don’t have the time to completely expound my point of view on that issue but a synopsis is this; Paying athlete’s is not a radical step, it is a natural step in the current progression of intercollegiate athletics. Players have been getting payed for their play on the field for decades, it has just been against the rules. Legalizing the process won’t lead increased activities of the type, it will just make legal a process that is already an institution. I really don’t object to the building and renovation expansion that is going on. What I do object to is the fact that the kids who play the games in the center of these stadiums across the country every week don’t get the cut that they deserve. Ohio State has a 110 million dollar athletics budget derived from ticket sales and booster donations but they can’t give the athletes who drive in all that revenue a little kick back? That is absurd.